Arsenal inquired about Enzo from Chelsea but withdrew due to high price

ArsenalRadar is citing the notoriously unreliable Simon Phillips—no credibility whatsoever. Next.

arsenal no dey buy cost player they are too stingy

will you change your attitude to stay or go

Enzo fernandes.what do you do now mmm

Chelsea bought him over 100 million pounds, how much is arsenal want to pay. withdrew due to high price, rubbish statement.

a player who can play as CM and AM is very great...these fellow fans are still blindfolded by a liability Odegaard,they can't even see he's the reason we had a hard challenge with City to a title... without him flexibility in the team is always great and less dependent on set pieces.. with just Merino and Eze,we were thriving on Seven games undefeated,what happens when he come back in Arteta's favor again?no more 9 pts clear and hoping for more but unnecessary draws and defeat due to lack of flexibility and productivity...that same quality that lacks in the game whenever he's available cost us the UCL...face facts

A stable supply channel

they think it's Kepa ?

What would Enzo be doing in Arsenal? We don’t actually need him even if he was the cheapest. All our midfielders are better than him and we don’t need his kind of aggression in our midfield. Bouaddi of Lille and Morocco is far better and will fit well in the Arsenal team

let him go to saudi or loan to Udine

Small club soon to be the biggest in England

Small Club, you think it's a cheap corner

With Rice so fatigued and the Premier League schedule so demanding, even if Enzo arrives, there won’t be an issue of insufficient playing time for anyone.

Your club doesn’t seem to actually have a player of that color.

How do I remember Simon being my car’s teammate?

Do we even need to ask? Obviously, it’s unaffordable.

Frankly, some so-called Arsenal fans on the forums lately have had me laughing—whenever they see other clubs signing certain players, they blindly blast the club’s management for “just buying players,” without first clarifying what the club actually needs. Let’s be clear: Arsenal are current Premier League champions—their needs are crystal clear. — A world-class left winger (a “big fish”), a rotational midfielder, and possibly a backup right-back. That means players like Anderson, Tonali, or “M-Fee” aren’t our most urgent priorities. Those signings are for clubs like Manchester City or Tottenham who are rebuilding or aiming to field starters week in, week out. Arsenal need rotation—not starters—and a £60 million rotational midfielder is more than sufficient. That means there’s no shortage of suitable midfield options on the market—even players deemed “second-choice” by elite clubs would fit us perfectly. Saving money for that top-tier left-winger remains the absolute priority. As for Monge? He’s merely a promising prospect—a nice “dessert.” Missing out is regrettable, but ultimately inconsequential. The fans currently berating the management aren’t really upset about missing Monge—they’re just envious that City and Spurs snapped up several midfielders. They haven’t stopped to consider Arsenal’s actual needs: you need pork belly, not a pile of premium radishes—what good is that?!

He would be a great choice for our annual Chelsea purchase.

this guy not the type of player Arsenal needs