According to The Athletic, Newcastle United FC has spent over £1 billion (approximately £1.3 billion USD) on player transfers since the takeover in summer 2021.

Under current ownership, the club has paid £960 million in fixed transfer fees for 38 new players. When agent fees and additional Premier League costs are included, this figure rises to approximately £1.09 billion. This total could increase further when various performance add-ons are triggered.

On October 7, 2021, a consortium backed by the Reuben family and controlled by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) acquired Newcastle United FC from Mike Ashley for an initial £305 million and subsequently injected nearly £500 million into the club.

The £1 billion figure is striking, and the average spending of £200 million per season aligns with external expectations for Newcastle's trajectory following the 2021 takeover. Before the takeover, Newcastle had annual spending below £120 million only once, while it was projected to exceed £280 million twice.

However, reports during the ownership change created misconceptions. Extravagant spending on transfers and attempting to replicate Manchester City's success were never part of Newcastle's plan. Meanwhile, other Premier League clubs tightened regulations on Associated Party Transactions (APT), severely restricting Newcastle's short-term commercial options.

In reality, UEFA and Premier League financial rules—initially the Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) and later the Squad Cost Ratio (SCR) domestically—made it impossible for Newcastle to replicate Manchester City's rise following their 2008 Abu Dhabi takeover. Recent penalties against Manchester City demonstrate that even their success stemmed from overspending that violated regulations.

When accounting for player sales revenue, Newcastle's net transfer spending since the takeover is close to £500 million. The club has generated over £500 million from player sales, a figure that could rise to £600 million if bonus conditions in agreements are triggered.

More significantly, Newcastle's net transfer spending has concentrated in early windows. Summer 2025 and 2026 saw the highest combined player spending—£241 million and £268 million respectively—but these periods also generated exceptional sale revenue.

The club's four most profitable sales—Isak (£125 million), Tonali (£92.5 million), Guimaraes (£75 million), and Gordon (£63 million)—all occurred during this period.

During the first four transfer windows following the takeover, Newcastle spent over £400 million but generated minimal sale revenue. In June 2024, panicked by PSR regulations and facing a two-digit points deduction, the club hastily sold Elliott Anderson and Yankuba Minteh for £35 million and £30 million respectively. This turmoil prompted a strategic shift, formalized as a "trading model" after sporting director Dan Ashworth and CEO Darren Eales were appointed last year.

As the data shows, Newcastle's average net spending over three consecutive years has increased significantly since Ashley's departure. While 2025 spending rebounded from the previous year's sharp decline, sale revenue also increased substantially. During this summer's transfer window, to comply with UEFA regulations, Newcastle had to sell Gordon to Barcelona and Tonali to Tottenham to fund a broader team rebuild.

Although Newcastle has broken its own transfer record twice under current ownership—signing Isak for £63 million in 2022 and Nick Woltemade for £64 million last year—they have never approached the £100 million mark that some rivals have reached multiple times. Their three highest transfer fees all came from the traditional "Big Six" clubs, highlighting the competitive disadvantage they still face. Newcastle's revenue levels prevent them from keeping pace with leading clubs. Since 2024, their net transfer spending has largely stalled, falling significantly below top clubs and sometimes below half their spending.

Compared to the Ashley era, Newcastle's current squad cost approaches that of leading clubs more closely, though gaps remain. "Squad cost" is a balance sheet figure calculated at the end of the financial year, encompassing all expenses recorded as assets related to player acquisitions and other football staff registrations. Newcastle's squad cost stood at £233.3 million in 2020-21 and increased to £581.1 million by 2024-25. In 2021, Manchester City had the highest squad cost at £977.7 million, nearly four times Newcastle's figure.

By 2025, Chelsea topped the rankings at £1.51 billion, less than three times Newcastle's figure. The gap has narrowed, and Newcastle's current trajectory resembles Tottenham and Liverpool more than it did during the Ashley era.

Newcastle's wage bill has also surged dramatically, rising from below the Premier League average for non-"Big Six" clubs to over 50% above that average by 2024-25 when they won the League Cup. In Ashley's final season, Newcastle's wage bill stood at £106.8 million, slightly below the average for the "other 13" Premier League clubs. By 2024-25, their total wage bill had jumped to £243.5 million, while the average for non-top clubs was £157.5 million.

Despite increased spending, Eddie Howe's team has performed above their wage bill level. This was most evident in 2022-23 when the team ranked 10th in wage spending but finished fourth and reached the Champions League. However, a disappointing 12th-place finish last season ended this trend. While Newcastle's wage bill has more than doubled since the takeover, the gap with "Big Six" average spending has not narrowed at the same rate. The problem is that "Big Six" wage spending has not stalled but increased by one-fifth. Given Newcastle's low starting base, bridging such a massive spending gap in the short to medium term is extremely difficult.

Eales has repeatedly stressed the direct link between wage spending and success. To achieve Newcastle's ambitious "2030 Vision," the club needs to invest more in wages, but Premier League and UEFA regulations tie spending to revenue, limiting the club's ability to increase wage budgets further. Wages are fixed costs that impact SCR, and Newcastle has begun efforts to reduce this expense during the recent transfer window. St. James' Park's hierarchy believes that European-level wage spending is no longer sustainable after finishing in the bottom half last season.

In future financial reports, Newcastle's wage bill is likely to decrease, emphasizing the difficulties challenger clubs face in rising to and establishing themselves among genuine top-tier competitors.

Newcastle has shifted from profitable operations under Ashley to substantial losses under current ownership. In 2017-18 and 2018-19, Newcastle made genuine profits. From 2021-22 to 2024-25, Newcastle's cumulative losses reached £254 million. Sources suggest the club expects additional losses exceeding £100 million in 2026-27.

Since PIF took over, Newcastle has lost over £70 million every season with available financial data. Losses would have been higher had they not sold St. James' Park and surrounding land to themselves for £176.2 million in June 2025. This move converted a £98.4 million loss into a reported £133.1 million profit. Newcastle, which previously resisted such PSR maneuvers, ultimately capitulated. Over these five years, fans and even some insiders have questioned PIF's commitment, given that plans for a new training facility were only announced in August, with the stadium's future remaining uncertain.

However, the owners have repeatedly covered losses through consistent capital injections. The consortium has invested £491.9 million into the club, averaging nearly £100 million per season. Only Chelsea (£1.26 billion), Everton (£705.9 million), and Aston Villa (£506.7 million) have received greater cumulative owner investment during this period.

Club management claims that if regulations permitted, the owners would inject additional funds. The consistent message is that Newcastle aims to spend the maximum allowed under regulations. Eales' plan involves significantly increasing Newcastle's revenue, which would reduce long-term owner dependency. However, despite performing above their financial status, Newcastle's success over these five years would have been impossible without strong PIF support.

แปลโดย AI

เว็บไซต์ AF เปิดตัวแล้ว! ดูข่าว ความคิดเห็น รายละเอียดแมตช์ และสถิติครบถ้วนบนคอมพิวเตอร์ของคุณ เยี่ยมชม: www.allfootballapp.com