During the Arsenal vs Sunderland match, a foul by Ngoyo on Dan Ballard resulted in a penalty. The Premier League's KMI evaluation panel has published its findings, with the entire expert panel unanimously concluding that the referee's decision to award the penalty was an error and should not have been given. However, the panel ruled 3-2 that the VAR's decision not to intervene was correct.

The expert panel voted 3-2 in favor of VAR's non-intervention. The majority of experts felt that, considering the actions of both players, the on-field decision did not constitute a clear and obvious error.
Why did the KMI expert panel vote that the on-field decision was incorrect, yet rule that VAR's choice not to intervene was correct?
The reviewing experts first assess the referee's decision, then evaluate how VAR handled it.
It is important to note: the Premier League sets a very high threshold for VAR intervention.
In this case, the expert panel determined that although the referee made an error and should not have awarded the penalty, the decision did not meet the standard of a "clear and obvious error," and therefore VAR intervention was not warranted.
Related reading: 【Arteta: How can they pull us down with a judo move and still get a penalty? It's impossible!】
Traduit par IA.
Le site web d'AF est désormais en ligne ! Actualités complètes, commentaires, détails des matchs et statistiques sur votre ordinateur. Visitez : www.allfootballapp.com
အာဆင်နယ်
ဆန်းဒါးလန်း
အက်ဇရီ ကွန်ဆာ
ဒန် ဘယ်လာ့ဒ်
မှတ်ချက် အားလုံး